The Karnataka High Court dismissed an appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC as withdrawn by the appellants, with liberty to file a regular first appeal, directing the registry to return the certified copies.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file regular first appeal; registry directed to return certified copies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH
R.S.A.NO.583/2021 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
2
KURGAL POST , VEMGAL HOBLI -563102, KOLAR TALUK AND DISTRICT.
[BY SRI BASAVANNA M.D., ADVOCATE]
AND:
THIS R.S.A IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.01.2021 PASSED IN R.A.NO.276/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE VI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU, DISMISSING
3
THE APPEAL FILED AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 18.02.2015 PASSED IN O.S.NO.404/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU.
THIS R.S.A. COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the appeal with liberty to file Regular First Appeal before this Court in pursuant to the objection raised by this office and to direct the Registry to return the certified copy of the judgment and decree passed by the Trial Court and the First Appellate Court.
Sd/JUDGE
MD
M. Rajanna & Ors.
Puttamma & Ors.
H.P. Sandesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
