examination of P.W.1 as nil and thereafter, adjourned the matter to 29.11.2006 for further evidence of the plaintiff. On 29.11.2006 also, adjourned the matter to 01.12.2006 for further evidence of plaintiff. On 01.12.2006, the plaintiff has filed the affidavit evidence of P.Ws.2 and 3 and on that day also, the learned counsel for defendant Nos.3 and 4 was absent. Hence, the Trial Court has taken the cross of P.Ws.2 and 3 as nil. Thereafter, a short date was given for the defendants’ evidence as 04.12.2006. On that day also, the defendants did not appear. Hence, the Trial Court has taken the evidence of defendants as nil and posted the matter for arguments on 05.12.2006. On 05.12.2006, learned counsel for the plaintiff took time and adjourned the matter finally to 07.12.2006 for arguments of the defendants. On 07.12.2006 also, learned counsel for the defendants’ was absent and hence, closed the arguments of the defendants and adjourned the matter to 12.12.2006 for judgment and the Trial Court pronounced the judgment on 12.12.2006. The counsel for the respondent-plaintiff would vehemently contend that the defendant Nos.3 and 4 though are represented through their counsel, did not appear and prosecute the matter. The suit is filed in the year 2004 and disposed of in
