The Second Appellate Court recorded a memo from the appellants seeking to withdraw the appeals due to an out-of-court settlement and dismissed the appeals accordingly.
Appeals dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF APRIL, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASWAMY
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.29 OF 2013 (DEC) C/W REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.41 OF 2013
IN R.S.A. NO.29/2013
BETWEEN:
SRI.SHIVAPPA, SON OF LATE RUDRAPPA, SINCE DEAD REPRESENTED BY HIS L.Rs.
SINCE DEAD REPRESENTED BY HER LEGAL HEIRS, I.E., APPELLANT NO.2 TO 6
2
APPELLANTS 1 TO 3 ARE RESIDENTS OF GADIKATTE VILLAGE, VADERAHATHUR POST, HONNALU TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT – 577 223.
(BY SRI.S.V.PRAKASH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
3
RESPONDENTS 1 AND 2 ARE RESIDENTS OF GADIKATTE VILLAGE, VADERAHATHUR POST, HONNALU TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT – 577 223.
(BY SRI.T.HAREESH BHANDARY, ADVOCATE FOR R2; R3 SERVED)
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 18.09.2012 PASSED IN R.A.NO.44/2007 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, HARIHAR, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 19.04.2007 PASSED IN O.S.NO.169/2000 ON THE FILE OF CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.), HONNALI.
IN R.S.A. NO.41/2013
BETWEEN:
SRI.SHIVAPPA, SON OF LATE RUDRAPPA, SINCE DEAD REPRESENTED BY HIS L.Rs.
SMT.PUTTAMMA, WIFE OF LATE SHIVAPPA,
4
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, HOUSE MAKER,
DIED ON 05.08.2012
(BY SRI.S.V.PRAKASH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
5
HANUMANTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, HOUSE MAKER.
BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF GADIKATTE VILLAGE, VADERAHATHUR POST, HONNALI TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT – 577 223.
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.T.HAREESH BHANDARY, ADVOCATE FOR R2; APPEAL DISMISSED AS ABATED AGAINST R1 VIDE ORDER DATED 27.01.2021)
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 18.09.2012 PASSED IN R.A.NO.88/2007 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, HARIHAR, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 31.10.2007 PASSED IN O.S.NO.183/2000 ON THE FILE OF CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.), HONNALI.
THESE REGULAR SECOND APPEALS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the appeals as the dispute is settled out of the Court.
6
withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
NR/-
Puttamma and others
Neelamma and others
Nataraj Rangaswamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
