The Karnataka High Court dismissed a regular second appeal filed by appellants against a judgment and decree as not pressed since the appellant sought to withdraw the appeal during hearing.
The regular second appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASWAMY REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1731 OF 2019 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
2
CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 522.
... APPELLANTS
(BY SRI.H.ASHOK KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.M.V.VEDAMURTHY, ADVOCATE)
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC 1908 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 06.08.2019 PASSED IN RA NO.57/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHITRADURGA
3
DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.08.2017 PASSED IN OS NO.24/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC CHALLAKERE.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
Sri. H. Ashok Kumar, learned counsel for the appellants
has filed a memo dated 09.04.2021 seeking permission of this
Court to withdraw the appeal as not pressed.
dismissed as not pressed .
Sd/JUDGE
NR/-
1 provisions across 1 enactments
PAPANNA.P@ PAPAIAH.P.
NAGARAJA. P.
MANJUNATHA
MANJULA
R.SRINIVASA
CHANNAVEERAPPA
NATARAJ RANGASWAMY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
