Siddaiah v. Nagaraji
Case brief
What is this about?
The court dismissed the second appeal on grounds of abatement, noting the appellant's death and lack of interest from legal representatives. No substantive legal proposition was advanced in the one-paragraph order.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF JULY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.277 OF 2013
BETWEEN:
Siddaiah S/o Siddaiah Aged about 68 years R/o Kandegala Village Kasaba Hobli Malavalli Taluk Mandya City-571 401.
…Appellant
(by Shri H B Chandrashekar, Advocate)
AND:
- Nagaraji W/o Nanjaiah Aged about 43 years R/o Nanjegowdanadoddi Village Kasaba Hobli Malavalli Taluk-571 430.
- Smt. Gowri W/o Doddathimmaiah Aged about 38 years Hadli Village Kasaba Hobli Malavalli Taluk-571 430.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Siddaiah S/o Siddaiah
- respondent
Nagaraji W/o Nanjaiah
- respondent
Smt. Gowri W/o Doddathimmaiah
- respondent
Nagaraju S/o Siddaiah
- respondent
Ankaiah S/o late Siddaiah
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- RSA/277/2013
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court