This order dismisses a Regular Second Appeal in a family suit regarding property status. The appellant failed to comply with an office objection granting one week time, resulting in the automatic dismissal of the appeal without a bench reference.
The appeal was dismissed due to non-compliance with the time granted for addressing the office objection.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF JULY 2021
BEFORE
THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 2357 OF 2011
BETWEEN
S/O LATE M G ASHWATHNARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
S/O LATE M G ASHWATHNARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF
NO.1649/2649, KONGADIYAPPA MAIN ROAD, DODDABALLAPUR
…2
RSA 2357/2011
2
W/O M R SHIVAKUMAR, D/O M G ASHWATHNARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,
R/O BASAVESHWARA TEMPLE ROAD, OPP. KADARAPPA KUNTE, VIDYANAGARA, DODDABALLAPUR
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
R/O NEAR KRISHNA THEATER, CHIKKABALLAPUR
... APPELLANTS
(By Sri. : K.V.LAKSHMANACHAR & S.SANTHOSH SHETTY, ADVOCATES)
AND
S/O LATE M G GOPALAKRISHNAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,
R/O GOPAL TALKIES ROAD, BEHIND RAMANJANAIAH TEMPLE AND CHOULTRY, DODDABALLAPURA
S/O LATE M G GOPALAKRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
…3
RSA 2357/2011
3
R/O TIGALARAPET, BEHIND MARAMMA TEMPLE, DODDABALLAPUR
... RESPONDENTS
(By Sri. : G. PAPI REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL FILED U/S.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT & DECREE DATED 19.07.2011 PASSED IN R.A.NO.134/2010 ON THE FILE OF II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE
…4
RSA 2357/2011
4
23.04.2010 PASSED IN O.S.NO.173/2005 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DODDABALLAPUR.
This Regular Second Appeal is coming on for orders, this day the Court made the following Order.
ORDER
No representation on behalf of the appellants.
One week time is granted to comply with the office objection. If
compliance is not made within one week from today, the appeal will be dismissed without reference to the Bench.
Sd/- JUDGE
NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 26.07.2021, office objection is not complied
with, hence appeal will be dismissed.
COPY
Sd/-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
T By: VS R By :PH C By: DS Ty Date: 18.01.2022
C Date: 20.01.2022
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal, which remained unfiled without response to the office objection within the stipulated time, should be allowed or dismissed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SMT K R SOUBHGYA
M G A RAVICHANDRA
M G A GOPI KRISHNA
M G A MURALIKRISHNA
SMT M G A RADHA
SMT M G A MEERA
E.S. INDIRESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
