Smt Munavalli Bandamma v. Sri Mudalgeri Channabasappa
Karnataka HCRSA/2386/2011
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
A regular second appeal was dismissed due to abatement upon the death of the sole respondent, as no steps were taken to bring the legal representatives on record.
What did the court decide?
Regular Second Appeal is allowed to abate.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
- 1 -
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
¶3
- DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2021
¶4
- BEFORE
¶5
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
¶6
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.2386 OF 2011(SP)
¶7
BETWEEN:
¶8
- SMT.MUNAVALLI BANDAMMA W/O.MUNAVALLI VEERABHADRAPPA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS R/AT RAMPUR
¶9
- DHARWAD – 580 001
¶10
- SRI KOPPALADA DODDAPPA S/O.KOPPALADA VEERAPPA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS R/AT SALERA ONI HARAPPANAHALLI – 583 131
¶11
- SRI K.VEERABHADDRAPPA S/O.LATE K.VEERAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT MEGALAPETE HARAPPANAHALLI – 583 131
¶12
- SRI K.RACHOTAPPA S/O.LATE K.VEERAPPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT VEERESH NILAYA GANDHINAGARA CHALLAKERE
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the regular second appeal can proceed when the sole respondent has died and no legal representatives have been brought on record.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Smt. Munavalli Bandamma
- appellant
Sri Koppalada Doddappa
- appellant
Sri K. Veerabhaddrappa
- appellant
Sri K. Rachotappa
- appellant
Sri K. Shekarappa
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- RSA/2386/2011
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court