Regular Second Appeal filed under Section 100 CPC was dismissed due to non-prosecution as office objections were not complied with within the prescribed time following a peremptory order of dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No. 803/2018
BETWEEN:
SRI.VATERIRA GANAPATHY S/O LATE APPAIAH AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS MAGGULA VILLAGE IYMANGALA POST VIRAJPET TALUK KODAGU – 571 218. …APPELLANT
(BY SRI N.RAVINDRANATH KAMATH, ADVOCATE)
AND :
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED.19.01.2018 PASSED IN R.A.NO.11/2012, ON
THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, VIRAJPET, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED.20.09.2012 PASSED IN O.S.NO.79/2002 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE, VIRAJPET.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
It is seen vide order dated 16.02.2021, this Court has passed peremptory order of dismissal of the appeal. Office objections have not been complied within the prescribed time
Sd/JUDGE
GVP
SRI.VATERIRA GANAPATHY S/O LATE APPAIAH
1. SMT. VATERIRA JYOTHI MANDANNA
2. SRI VATERIRA CHETHAN MANDANNA
PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
