Second appeal dismissed as withdrawn after parties filed a settlement memo. Court directed refund of court fee.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; court fee refunded to registry.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JULY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.187 OF 2014
BETWEEN :
Smt. Uma Maheshwari W/o Krishnamurthy Aged about 52 years R/o Market Road Chikmaglur City-577 101.
…Appellant
(by Sri T A Karumbaiah, Advocate)
AND:
…Respondents
(by Sri B M Siddappa, Advocate for R1 and 2)
This Regular Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and decree dated 20.12.2013 passed in RA.No. 118 of 2012 on the file of the II Additional District Judge, Chikmagalur, dismissing the appeal and confirming the judgment and decree dated 25.09.2012 passed in O/S. No.279 of 2005 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Chikmagalur.
2
This Appeal coming on for orders, this day, the Court delivered the following:
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo dated 09.10.2020 stating that the parties to the lis have settled the dispute amicably and therefore, requests this
Court to dismiss the appeal as withdrawn.
Memo is placed on record.
Accordingly, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Registry is directed to refund the Court fee in
accordance with law.
Sd/-
JUDGE
UN
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
noneReferred
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Uma Maheshwari
Smt. Mohini Bai
Prakash
E.S. Indiresh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
E.S. Indiresh
Parties & counsel
