Appellants withdrew the revisional appeal, seeking liberty to approach authorities for land acquisition. The High Court allowed the withdrawal, dismissed the appeal, and ordered the return of the deposited amount.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; deposit returned to appellants.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF APRIL, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASWAMY
R.S.A. NO. 2064 OF 2017 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
…APPELLANTS
[BY SMT. PADMA S. UTTUR, ADVOCATE (THROUGH VC)]
AND:
Y.P.SRINIVASA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, S/O Y.PADMANABHAIAH SHETTY, M.G.ROAD, SRINIVASAPUR TOWN, KOLAR DISTRICT-563101.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. L. VENKATARAMA REDDY, ADVOCATE)
2
THIS R.S.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 17.04.2017 PASSED IN R.A.NO.189/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, KOLAR DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20.08.2014 PASSED IN O.S.NO.208/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SRINIVASPUR.
THIS R.S.A. COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Smt. Padma S. Uttur, learned counsel for appellants appeared through video conference and after arguing for some time submits that she would withdraw the appeal and seeks liberty to approach the concerned authority for acquisition of land in question.
3
interlocutory applications shall be consigned to the record.
Sd/JUDGE
hnm
The Managing Director KPTCL
The Chief Engineer KPTCL
The Executive Engineer KPTCL
The Assistant Engineer KPTCL
Y.P. Srinivasa Shetty
Nataraj Rangaswamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
