Regular Second Appeal (CPC S. 100) dismissed on the condition that the appellant was permitted to withdraw the appeal. No substantive legal principle laid down.
Appellant permitted to withdraw the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF MARCH, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASWAMY
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1383 OF 2017 (RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI. D. RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, S/O LATE SRI. DEVAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, R/O DAPPARTHI VILLAGE, SOMENAHALLI HOBLI, GUDIBANDA TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT–561209. ... APPELLANT
(BY SMT.RAJESHWARI M., ADVOCATE)
AND:
… RESPONDENTS
2
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 15.3.2017 PASSED IN RA NO.240/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHICKBALLAPUR, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.9.2014 PASSED IN OS NO.120/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, GUDIBANDA.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Smt. Rajeshwari M., learned counsel for the
appellant has filed a memo dated 01.03.2021 seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the appeal.
dismissed as withdrawn .
Sd/JUDGE
NR/-
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri. D. Ramakrishna Reddy
Smt. Lakshmidervamma
Sri. D. Prakash
Nataraj Rangaswamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
