The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a regular second appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC as not pressed by the appellant, following a memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal.
The regular second appeal was dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF MARCH, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASWAMY
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1697 OF 2011 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
(BY SRI. M.V.SRINIVASAREDDY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
2
3
(BY SRI. M.V.NAVEEN REDDY, ADV. FOR R1 (a to g), R2 & R3; SRI.N.NAGARAJA, ADVOCATE FOR R4 AND R6; R5(a)(b)(c)(d) – SERVED BUT UNREPRESENTED)
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 29.11.2010 PASSED IN R.A.NO.236/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE PRESIDING OFFICER, FAST TRACK COURT-II BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BANGALORE, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 5.6.2009 PASSED IN O.S.NO.176/1999 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. II CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BANGALORE.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
4
JUDGMENT
Sri. M.V.Srinivasareddy, learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants are not interested in pursuing the appeal and has filed a memo dated 01.03.2021 seeking permission of this
Court to withdraw the appeal as not pressed.
not pressed.
Sd/JUDGE
NR/-
SMT. CHIKKATHAYAMMA AND ANR.
SRI. MARAIAH AND ORS.
NATARAJ RANGASWAMY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
