The High Court of Karnataka disposed of a revision appeal filed under Section 96 CPC. The court accepted a compromise petition filed under Order 23 Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC and directed the office to draw a decree accordingly.
Directed the office to draw a decree in terms of the compromise petition and disposed of the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH
R.F.A.NO.1384/2012 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
SRI MUNIRAJU, S/O LATE KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT NO.4A, MARUTHINAGAR, 80 FEET ROAD, 14TH CROSS, CHANDRALAYOUT, BENGALURU-560079.
LEGAL HEIRS OF APPELLANTS
S/O LATE MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT NO.4A, MARUTHINAGAR, 80 FEET ROAD, 14TH CROSS, CHANDRALAYOUT, BENGALURU-560007.
1(b) KIRAN KUMAR, S/O LATE MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/AT NO.4A, MARUTHINAGAR, 80 FEET ROAD, 14TH CROSS, CHANDRALAYOUT, BENGALURU-560007.
2
R/AT NO.4A, MARUTHINAGAR, 80 FEET ROAD, 14TH CROSS, CHANDRALAYOUT, BENGALURU-560079. … APPELLANTS
[BY SRI RANGASWAMAIAH R.L., ADVOCATE FOR APPELLANT 1(a TO c)]
AND:
3
AGE: MAJOR, R/AT NO.2753/2, NO.8 ‘G’ CROSS, 14TH MAIN, RPC LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560040.
THIS R.F.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.04.2012 PASSED IN O.S.NO.4103/2005 ON THE FILE OF THE XXV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION AND FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
THIS R.F.A. COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
All the parties i.e., the appellants and the respondents are
present. The respective learned counsel are also present. The contents of the compromise petition filed under Order 23 Rule 3
read with Section 151 of CPC is read and explained and the
4
parties have accepted the same. The office is directed to draw the decree in terms of the compromise petition.
Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of.
Sd/JUDGE
MD
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the compromise petition filed under Order 23 Rule 3 read with Section 151 of CPC is valid and acceptable.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri Muniraju
Nayayanamma
Gowaramma
S.M. Lokesh
Narasamma
Triveni
H.P. SanDEsh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
