Disposed

B.Shantharaju v. the Divisional Controller

Karnataka HC18 Dec 2021MFA/4433/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court Mega Lok Adalat settled an appeal against a Motor Vehicles Claims Tribunal award. The Court ordered a lump-sum enhancement of compensation to Rs.1,00,000 with interest if not deposited within six weeks, modifying the Tribunal judgment and closing the appeal in terms of a joint memo.

What did the court decide?

Settlement of Rs.1,00,000 enhancement accorded with 9% p.a. interest on delay; Tribunal judgment modified.

B.Shantharaju Vs the Divisional Controller — Money Laundering | Karnataka HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE MEGA LOK ADALAT

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 18^TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2021

¶5

CONCILIATORS PRESENT:

¶6

THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA

¶7

¶8

SMT. MANJULA N TEJASWI, MEMBER

¶9

M.F.A.No.4433/2020(MV) (Lok Adalat No.2754/2021)

¶10

BETWEEN:

¶11

B. SHANTHARAJU, S/O BASAVASHETTY, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT MANGALA VILLAGE, CHAMARAJANAGAR TQ AND DISTRICT- 571 441.

¶12

... APPELLANT

¶13

(BY SRI. SREENIVASAN M. Y., ADVOCATE)

¶14

AND:

¶15

THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER OWNER CUM CUSTODIAN INTERNAL INSURANCE FUND OF KSRTC, K. H. DOUBLE ROAD, SHANTHINAGARA, BENGALURU - 560 027. (BY Smt. RADHA B. P., ADVOCATE)

¶16

...RESPONDENT

¶17

¶18

THIS MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 02.01.2020 PASSED IN MVC NO.267/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CHAMARAJANAGAR, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

¶19

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE MEGA LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED.

¶20

CONCILIATION ORDER

¶21

The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant - Claimant is present through video conferencing/Physical Hearing. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – KSRTC along with its representative are present.

¶22

After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellant/claimant (being authorized by the appellant/claimant to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent - KSRTC and its authorized officer is filed. The appellant-claimant has agreed to receive and the respondent-KSRTC has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.1,00,000/(Rupees One Lakhs only), in addition to what has been awarded by the claims tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim.

¶23

¶24

The Respondent - KSRTC has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit.

¶25

The entire enhanced compensation amount shall be released in favour of the appellant – claimant, on proper identification.

¶26

This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment of the Tribunal shall stands modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly.

¶27

Sd/JUDGE

¶28

Sd/MEMBER

¶29

B.Shantharaju v. the Divisional Controller

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B.Shantharaju v. the Divisional Controller

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Halappa Vs Balappa

Smt Rekha Vs Sri Raghavendra Poojary

Jayashankara @ Jayashekara Vs v K Shivappa

Sachin @ Sachin Ramachandrarao Vs Parameshwarappa D

Mr. Mujahid Pasha Vs Mrs. Farzana Tabassum

Smt. Vijayalakshmi and Ors. Vs Sri. Revanasiddappa and Ors.