Disposed

Mr. Mujahid Pasha v. Mrs. Farzana Tabassum

Karnataka HC18 Dec 2021CRL.RP/924/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court Lok Adalat conciliated a criminal revision petition regarding matrimonial maintenance disputes. Parties agreed to clear arrears of maintenance in six equal monthly instalments starting January 2022. The court dismissed the matter after recording the joint settlement memo while preserving other pending litigations.

What did the court decide?

Arrears of maintenance to be paid in 6 equal monthly installments from Jan 2022; rest of pending suits continue.

Mr. Mujahid Pasha Vs Mrs. Farzana Tabassum — Maintenance and Alimony | Karnataka HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE MEGA LOK ADALAT

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 18^TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2021

¶5

CONCILIATORS PRESENT:

¶6

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR

¶7

¶8

SMT. S.SUSHEELA, MEMBER

¶9

Crl.RP No. 924/2019

¶10

(Lok Adalat No. 3190/2021)

¶11

BETWEEN:

¶12

MR. MUJAHID PASHA, ADVOCATE,

¶13

S/O A. MUSHTAQ AHMED,

¶14

AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,

¶15

MR. A. MUSHTAQ AHMED, F/O MUJAHID PASHA,

¶16

AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,

¶17

MRS. ZAREENA BEGUM, W/O A.MUSHTAQ AHMED, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,

¶18

PETITIONERS NO.01 TO 03 ARE

¶19

R/O. N.N.T ROAD EAST,

¶20

MAHABOOBNAGARA,

¶21

CHINTAMANI TOWN,

¶22

CHICKBALLAPUR DISTRICT - 563 125.

¶23

... PETITIONERS

¶24

(BY SRI. HARISH KUMAR M S, ADVOCATE)

¶25

AND:

¶26

MRS. FARZANA TABASSUM,

¶27

W/O MUJAHID PASHA,

¶28

D/O ABDUL BASHEER,

¶29

AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,

¶30

¶31

BABY MEHAK ZAINA, D/O MUJAHID PASHA AND FIRST PETITIONER, AGED 01 YEAR 08 MONTHS THE PETITIONER NO.2 IS A MINOR AND SHE IS UNDER THE CARE AND CUSTODY OF THE FIRST PETITIONER AND BOTH ARE R/AT C/O MUNAWAR PASHA, FRUIT MERCHANT, BEHIND KGN HIGH SCHOOL, WARD NO.25, CHINTAMANI TOWN, CHICKBALLAPUR DISTRICT - 563 125.

¶32

... RESPONDENTS

¶33

(BY SRI. MOHAMMED SADEER AHMED, ADVOCATE R1 & R2)

¶34

THIS CRL.RP FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO

¶35

(a) SET ASIDE THE ORDER IN CRL.A.NO.96/2017 DATED 01.07.2019 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE COURT OF 2nd ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT CHIKKABALLAPURA, SITTING AT CHINTAMANI, CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED IN D.V.C. NO.03/2016 BY THE HON'BLE COURT OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINTAMANI DATED 12.10.2017.

¶36

(b)SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED IN D.V.C.NO.03/2016 BY THE HON'BLE COURT HON'BLE COURT OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINTAMANI DATED 12.10.2017.

¶37

THIS CRL.RP COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE MEGA LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED.

¶38

CONCILIATION ORDER

¶39

The learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner & Respondent

¶40

are present through video conferencing/Physical Hearing.

¶41

¶42

2. Sri. Mujahid Pasha and his advocate

¶43

Sri. Gangadhar are present. Smt. Farzana Tabassum respondent with her daughter and Sri. Mohammed Sadeer Ahmed are present. The First Petitioner has agreed to pay the arrears of maintenance as on today in six monthly installments starting from 1st January 2022 and has filed joint memo, which reads as under:

¶44

"Petitioner No.1 shall clear all arrears of maintenance in 6 installments from January 2022 in six months in equal proportion. All the cases will be pending and shall continue and the same may be recorded by accepting this joint memo in the interest of justice ."

¶45

3. Accordingly, this Crl.RP is hereby disposed of in terms of the

Joint Memo.

Sd/JUDGE

Sd/-

MEMBER

FILED BEFORE LOKADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU CRL. R.P. NO. 924/2019 (LOK ADALATH NO. 3190/2021)

¶53

BETWEEN:

¶54

MR. MUJAHID PASHA & ANOTHER

¶55

… PETITIONER

¶56

AND:

¶57

MRS. FARZANA TABASSUM & ANOTHER …RESPONDENTS

¶58

JOINT MEMO

¶59

Petitioner No.1 shall clear all arrears of maintenance in 6 installments from

¶60

January 2022 in six months in equal proportion. All the cases will be pending and shall continue and the same may be recorded by accepting this joint memo in the

¶61

interest of justice .

¶62

BENGALURU: Sd/DATE : 18/12/2021 PETITIONER NO.1

¶63

Sd/ADVOCATE FOR PETITIONERS

¶64

Sd/RESPONDENTS

¶65

Sd/ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENTS

¶66

True Copy

¶67

Sd/(Secretary)

Mr. Mujahid Pasha v. Mrs. Farzana Tabassum

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr. Mujahid Pasha v. Mrs. Farzana Tabassum

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Halappa Vs Balappa

Smt Rekha Vs Sri Raghavendra Poojary

Jayashankara @ Jayashekara Vs v K Shivappa

Sachin @ Sachin Ramachandrarao Vs Parameshwarappa D

Smt. Vijayalakshmi and Ors. Vs Sri. Revanasiddappa and Ors.

Sri. Shivakumar Vs H. B. Devarajegowda