Thin order dismissing the M.F.A. against a Final Judgment and Decree in a Guardians and Wards dispute for non-prosecution due to absence of both parties despite multiple callings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.DESAI
M.F.A.No.1729/2016 (GW)
BETWEEN :
SMT.JUHI SINHA W/O SRI M.CHANDRA MOHAN, D/O SRI RANJEEV KUMAR SINHA, AGED 21 YEARS, R/AT NO.6 STEPHENS ROAD CROSS, FRAZER TOWN, BANGALORE-560005 ...APPELLANT
(BY SRI AYUB KHAN K., ADV. – ABSENT.)
AND :
M.CHANDRA MOHAN S/O LATE S.MOHAN RAO AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, R/AT NO.11/1, COX TOWN WEBSTER ROAD, THAMBUCHETTY ROAD, BANGALORE-560006 …RESPONDENT
(BY SRI A.RAMESH GOWDA, ADV. – ABSENT.)
THIS M.F.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 47 OF THE GUARDIANS AND WARDS ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 02.11.2015 PASSED IN G & WC No.46/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE 3RD ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU, ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTIONS 6 & 7 OF G & WC ACT.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, S. SUJATHA, J ., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
As could be seen from the order sheet, even on
earlier two occasions, there was no representation on behalf of the parties. Even today, the matter was called twice. In the second round also, there is no representation on behalf of the parties. It appears, the parties are not serious in prosecuting the appeal.
Appeal stands dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
Dvr:
Juhi Sinha
M. Chandra Mohan
S. Sujatha
P.N. Desai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
