Appellants filed a memorandum to withdraw an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. The High Court of Karnataka granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the appeal accordingly.
Permission granted to withdraw the appeal; appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE S. SUJATHA
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.N. DESAI
M.F.A No.8696/2016 (AA)
BETWEEN :
(BY SRIYUTHS LOMESH KIRAN N. & AJAY SHANKAR RAO, ADVOCATES)
AND
(BY SRI. SANJAY NAIR, ADVOCATE FOR R1)
This M.F.A. is filed under section 37(1)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act against the Judgment and award dated 14.12.2016 passed in A.A No.497/2016 on the file of the 6th Additional City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, issuing notice on the main petition a/w emergent notice of I.A No.1 filed u/o 39 Rule 1 & 2, r/w Section 151 of CPC.
This appeal coming on for Orders, this day, S. Sujatha, J ., delivered the following:
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the appeal.
Memo is placed on record. Permission is granted.
The appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
LL
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mr. J. Boopesh Reddy
Mr. J. Vijay Reddy
Mr. B.T. Premkumar
Mr. B.M. Shamu
Mr. Damodhar
S. Sujatha
P.N. Desai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
