The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the first appeal under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act because the appellant failed to comply with a peremptory order dated 28.02.2020. No representations were filed.
The appeal was dismissed for non-compliance with a peremptory order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
M.F.A.No.1056/2019
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.1056/2019 (LAC)
BETWEEN:
THIRTHAPPA, S/O BASAPPA, AGE: MAJOR, R/AT HATTUR VILLAGE, HONNALI TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT, REP. BY HIS GPA HOLDER, V.NARAYANA, S/O VENKARACHALA, R/AT GADIKOPPA LAYOUT, WARD NO.35, SHIMOGA. …APPELLANT
(BY SRI SANGAMESH.G.PATIL, ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 54(1) OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 12.12.2012 PASSED IN LACT NO.28/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, HARIHAR, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
M.F.A.No.1056/2019
2
THIS MFA COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
No representation for the appellant. The
peremptory order dated 28.02.2020 is not complied.
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed.
Sd/JUDGE
pgg
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Thirthisappa
V. Narayana
The Special Land Acquisition Officer UTP Shimoga
The Executive Engineer Neeravari Nigama Niyamitha Irrigation Department
K.S. Mudagal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
