Partly allowed

M/S Rao Computer Consultants Pvt. Ltd., v. the Deputy Commissioner

Karnataka HC30 Aug 2021ITA/849/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Karnataka allowed this tax appeal. It held that questions regarding the classification of rental income and the treatment of related expenditures were covered by a coordinate bench decision favoring the assessee. Consequently, the appeal was partly allowed, directing a reexamination of allowable expenses.

What did the court decide?

Substantial Questions of Law Nos. 1 and 2 answered against revenue; Assessing authority directed to reexamine expenditure deductions (insurance, brokerage, depreciation).

M/S Rao Computer Consultants Pvt. Ltd., Vs the Deputy… — Specific Performance | Karnataka HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30^TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2021

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA

¶4

AND

¶5

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V. HOSMANI

¶6

I.T.A.No.849/2018

¶7

BETWEEN :

¶8

M/s RAO COMPUTER CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD., NEIL RAO TOWERS, PLOT NO.118, ROAD NO.3, EPIP I PHASE, WHITEFIELD BANGALORE - 560 066 REP BY ITS DIRECTOR SRI DHANUNJAYA VAYUGUNDLA RAO S/O LATE BASAVAIAH AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS PAN NO. AAACR 8427R

¶9

...APPELLANT

¶10

(BY SMT.VANI H., ADV.)

¶11

AND :

¶12

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 12(4), BANGALORE …RESPONDENT

¶13

(BY SRI K.V.ARAVIND, ADV.)

¶14

¶15

THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 28.09.2018 PASSED IN ITA NO.2622/BANG/2017, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 20092010 PRAYING THIS HON'BLE COURT TO (A) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE. (B) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET-ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PASSED IN ITA NO.2622/BANG/2017 RELATING TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-2010.

¶16

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, S. SUJATHA, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶17

J U D G M E N T

¶18

This appeal is filed under Section 260-A of the

¶19

Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ for short) by the assessee challenging the order dated 28-09-2018 passed in ITA 2622/Bang/2017 by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bengaluru Bench ‘A’, Bengaluru, relating to the assessment years 2008-09 to 2010-11, raising the following substantial questions of law:-

¶20

“1. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the findings of the Appellate Tribunal that income earned by the appellant from complex commercial activity of letting out of the building along with other amenities in the industrial park shall be treated

¶21

¶22

as ‘income from house property’ are perverse and illegal?

¶23

2. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the authorities below erred in treating the business income derived from complex commercial activities of letting out buildings along with the other amenities in an industrial park as income from house property ignoring the law laid down by this Hon’ble Court in the case of Velankani Information Systems and the Circular issued by the Department?

¶24

3. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the authorities below erred in disallowing the expenditure towards insurance, brokerage and depreciation incurred wholly and exclusively for the purposes of the business of complex commercial letting out services and whether the findings of the Appellate Tribunal in this regard are perverse?”

¶25

2. The learned counsel appearing for the parties

¶26

submitted ad-idem that substantial questions of law Nos.1 and 2 raised herein, are squarely covered by the decision

¶27

¶28

of the coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of M/s.

¶29

RAO COMPUTERS CONSULTANTS PRIVATE LTD., vs. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (OSD), O/O CIT-III, BANGALORE,, ITA No.711/2017 (D.D.26-05-2021), wherein the coordinate Bench placing reliance on the Judgment of this Court in the case of CIT vs.VELANKANI INFORMATION SYSTEMS PVT LTD., reported in (2014)2 ITR-OL 138 KAR has answered the substantial questions of law framed in the appeal in favour of the assessee and against the revenue quashing the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal relating to the relevant assessment year therein, allowing the appeal filed by the assessee.

¶30

In view of the aforesaid ruling of this Court, the substantial question of law Nos. 1 and 2 are answered against the revenue and in favour of the assessee.

¶31

As regards the substantial question of law No.3 is concerned, there is no finding by the assessing authority inasmuch as disallowing the expenditure referred to

¶32

¶33

therein. In view of the finding given by this Court relating to the substantial question of law Nos. 1 and 2 as aforesaid, the assessing authority is directed to reexamine the issue inasmuch as expenditure/deductions towards insurance, brokerage and depreciation incurred for the purposes of the business of complex commercial letting out services, in an expedite manner.

¶34

The appeal is partly allowed to the extent indicated

above.

Sd/JUDGE

Sd/JUDGE

Rsk/-

M/S Rao Computer Consultants Pvt. Ltd., v. the Deputy Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Rao Computer Consultants Pvt. Ltd., v. the Deputy Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri. Balakrishna K Vs Sri. Shantilal J Shah

Banglore Development Authority Vs Mr. Ramakrishna Reddy

Sri M.Arun Kumar Vs K. Shantharaju Since Dead

M/S Kaseya Software India Private Ltd. Vs the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Pr. Commissioner of Income TAX-5 Vs M/S PNB Metlife India

M/S Rao Computer Consutlants Pvt. Ltd., Vs the Deputy Commissioner