Dismissed
Sri. Balakrishna K v. Sri. Shantilal J Shah
Karnataka HCRFA/297/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V. HOSMANI
R.F.A.No.297/2017(RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI. BALAKRISHNA.K S/O LATE KORAGA SHERIGAR AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS HOTEL SRI SAI STAR CHARU COMFORTS #211, COTTONPET MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU. ALSO AT ‘KRISHNA NIVAS’ NO.6-1-48D9, NEAR BUNTS HOSTEL UDUPI-576 101. ...APPELLANT
(BY SRI.GOVINDARAJ K.JOISA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI.SHANTILAL J.SHAH S/O LATE JIVRAJ J.SHAH AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS NO.1032, DR.RAJKUMAR ROAD 4TH BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR BANGALORE-560 053 REP. BY GPA CHETHAN S.SHAH. ...RESPONDENT
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED: 02.07.2016 PASSED IN O.S.NO.3312/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE XXX ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY.
2
THIS RFA COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, S.SUJATHA J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
Despite reasonable opportunity provided to the appellant, the office objections are not complied with. This Court vide order dated 31.02.2021 has made it clear, if the office objections are not complied within one week, office shall post the appeal for passing the order of dismissal for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
BVK
SRI. BALAKRISHNA.K
SRI.SHANTILAL J.SHAH
S. SUJATHA
RAVI V. HOSMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court