Sri v. Sathyanarayana Setty v Sri Bhadra Reddy
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Karnataka rejected a civil revision petition challenging the lower court's refusal to dismiss a suit for perpetual injunction at the threshold. The High Court upheld the trial court's view that factual disputes precluded rejection of the plaint.
What did the court decide?
The civil revision petition was rejected.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.271 OF 2018
BETWEEN:
SRI. V. SATHYANARAYANA SETTY, S/O SRI. VENKATANANJAIAH SETTY, AGED ABOUT 88 YEARS, R/A NO.477, BURUGAL MUTT CROSS, V.V.PURAM, BENGALURU - 560 004. SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE
SMT.K.H.LAKSHMI, D/O LATE V.SATHYANARAYANA SETTY, W/O K.R.HARINATH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT NO.222A/1, SHIVANIVAS, 13TH CROSS, WEST OF CHORD ROAD, MAHALAKSHMIPURAM, BENGALURU - 560 086.
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI.T.P.RAJENDRA KUMAR SUNGAY, ADVOCATE FOR LRS OF DECEASED PETITIONER)
AND:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the rejection of a plaint under Order VII Rule 11 read with Section 151 of the CPC was correct in the present circumstances.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Smt. K.H. Lakshmi
- respondent
Sri. Bhadra Reddy
Coram
R. Nataraj
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRP/271/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court