Writ petition under Articles 226 and 228 of the Constitution of India regarding a revision petition order was dismissed for non-prosecution due to failure to pursue the matter despite granted time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ
WRIT PETITION NO.31980 OF 2013 (KLR - RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI. DODDABAILAPPA, S/O LATE CHIKKAHANUMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/O SULIKERE VILLAGE, KENGERI HOBLI BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK AND DISTRICT - 560 060.
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI.H.N.THARESH, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
2
KENGERI HOBLI BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK AND DISTRICT - 560 060.
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.A.R.SRINIVAS, AGA)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 12.6.2013 IN THE REVISION PETITION NO.281/2012-13 AS VACATING THE I.O. VIDE ANNEXURE - K AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
There is no representation for the petitioner.
however, no steps are taken till date.
non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
NR/-
SRI. DODDABAILAPPA
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
THE TAHASILDAR
THE COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
SRI. M. CHANNEGOWDA
R. NATARAJ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
