This criminal petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for anticipatory bail was dismissed as the petitioner was found uninterested in prosecuting the matter and legal counsel was absent.
n/a
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE M.G. UMA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.81 OF 2021
BETWEEN :
MR. R N RETHESH S/O NANJUNDAIAH R N, AGED 39 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.MF-7D, SRS KEB QUARTERS, PEENYA 1ST STAGE, PEENYA INDUSTRIAL AREA, BENGALURU-560 058
… PETITIONER (BY SRI.SHIVA REDDY T.N., ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND :
THE STATE BY RAJAGOPALANGAR POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY PP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU-560 001 … RESPONDENT (BY SRI.K.S. ABHIJITH, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 438 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN THE EVENT OF HIS ARREST FOR AN OFFENCE P/U/S 498A OF IPC AND SEC.3,4 OF D.P ACT REGISTERED ON THE BASIS OF THE COMPLAINT MAY FILE BY ONE SMT. SHASHIKALA.S WIFE OF THE PETITIONER AND HER PARENTS HEREIN.
2
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. No
representation.
Section 438 of Cr.P.C on 04.01.2021. The matter is being listed for third time for non-compliance of office objections.
matter. Hence, the petition is dismissed.
Sd/JUDGE
UN
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a bail petition filed by an uninterested petitioner without counsel should be entertained or dismissed.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
MR. R N RETHESH
THE STATE
M.G. UMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
