Sri Karthik v. State by Rajagopalanagar
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal petition for bail filed under Section 439 CrPC. Petitioner counsel was absent. Court dismissed petition finding petitioner lacked interest in prosecuting the matter.
Criminal petition for bail filed under Section 439 CrPC. Petitioner counsel was absent. Court dismissed petition finding petitioner lacked interest in prosecuting the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE M.G. UMA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.2402 OF 2020
BETWEEN :
SRI KARTHIK S/O SATYAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/AT VALIPURA VILLAGE VARTHUR POST BENGALURU - 560 087.
… PETITIONER (BY SRI.V.N. KUMAR, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND :
STATE BY RAJAGOPALANAGAR POLICE STATION BENGALURU – CITY REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PUBLIC PROSECUTORS OFFICE HIGH COURT BUILDING HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU - 560 001.
… RESPONDENT (BY SRI.K.S. ABHIJITH, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CR.NO.588/2019 OF RAJAGOPAL NAGAR P.S., BANGALORE FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 420,376,313,499,506,504 R/W 34 OF IPC.
2
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. No representation.
the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter. Hence, the petition is dismissed.
Sd/JUDGE
UN
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SRI KARTHIK S/O SATYAMURTHY
STATE BY RAJAGOPAL NAGAR POLICE STATION BENGALURU
M.G. UMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court