A criminal petition for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. regarding an NDPS offence was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner's advocate was absent on the hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 05TH DAY OF MARCH 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
CRIMINAL PETITION No.7098 OF 2020
BETWEEN
…Petitioners
(By Sri. Naveed Ahmed, Advocate)
AND
The State of Karnataka Through Hennur Police Station, Represented by the Public prosecutor, High Court Building, Bengaluru-560001. (By Sri. Thejesh, HCGP)
…Respondent
2
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Cr.No.212/2020 of Hennur Police Station, Bengaluru, for the offence punishable under Section 22(c) of NDPS Act.
This Criminal Petition pertaining to Principal Bench, Bengaluru, coming on for orders through video conferencing at Dharwad, this day, the court made the following:
ORDER
Petitioners counsel is absent today also. On the last
date also he was absent. It appears that the petitioner is not interested. Therefore, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
clk
Taabsheer K.
Lazim Nasir
The State of Karnataka
Sreenivas Harish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
