The petitioner, absent from the hearing, sought bail in a criminal case involving kidnapping, rape, and POCSO charges. The High Court dismissed the bail petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner was not interested.
The bail petition was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the absence of the petitioner and counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 05TH DAY OF MARCH 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
CRIMINAL PETITION No. 7095 OF 2020
BETWEEN
Vinesh @ Vinay, S/o. Ramesh, Aged about 26 years, Residing at House No.06., Sharieff Nagara, Yeshwanthapura, Bengaluru City.
…Petitioner
(By Sri. Ranganatha K., Advocate)
AND
…Respondents
(By Sri. Thejesh P, HCGP, for R1)
2
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Cr.No.198/2016 (Spl.C.No.367/2016) of Yeshwanthapura Police Station, Bengaluru, for the offence punishable under Sections 363 and 376 of IPC and Sections 3, 4, 5, 7 and 8 of POCSO Act.
This Criminal Petition pertaining to Principal Bench, Bengaluru, coming on for orders through video conferencing at Dharwad, this day, the court made the following:
ORDER
The order sheet shows that the petitioner’s counsel has been absent continuously. Today also he is absent. Government Pleader is present. It appears that the petitioner is not interested. Therefore, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
clk
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vinesh @ Vinay
State of Karnataka
Amith Kumar
Sreenivas Harish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
