Dismissed
Arun Kumar v. Vs Vinod Krishna Murthy
Karnataka HCCRL.P/4311/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU…
What the court decided
AI extract
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. SOMASHEKAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO.4311/2019
BETWEEN:
ARUN KUMAR V., AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, S/O. B.N. VAJRAVELU, R/AT NO.839, 5TH BLOCK 17TH F MAIN, RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE-10
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI RAVI L. VAIDYA, ADVOCATE (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING))
AND
VINOD KRISHNA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, S/O. KRISHNAMURTHY, R/AT N.714, 3RD BLOCK, 3RD STAGE, 8TH D MAIN, BASAVESHWARANAGARA, BENGALURU-79
… RESPONDENT
-2-
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 10.06.2019 PASSED BY THE LXI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU IN CRL.RP NO.178/2019 ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel Sri Ravi L. Vaidya for the petitioner is appearing through video conferencing and fairly submits that the petitioner is not inclined to persuade this matter. Consequently, seeking permission to withdraw the petition as not pressed.
2. The submission of the learned counsel is placed
on record. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. In the meanwhile the counsel for the petitioner is directed to file a memo to that effect for the purpose of reference in this matter.
-3-
does not survive for consideration, consequently it stands dismissed.
Sd/JUDGE
SBS*
Arun Kumar V.
Vinod Krishna Murthy
K. Somashekar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court