Dismissed

Sane Sajana Reddy v. Adarsha Palm Retreat Gulmohar Residents

Karnataka HC8 Mar 2021CMP/220/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In CM 220/2020, the High Court at Bengaluru addressed the petitioners' administration of a fresh reference to arbitration. Upon hearing that they wished to withdraw the petition while retaining registration for future arbitration, the Court dismissed the petition but reserved liberty to file a fresh petition.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed; liberty reserved to file a fresh petition.

Sane Sajana Reddy Vs Adarsha Palm Retreat Gulmohar Residents — Arbitration | Karnataka HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 8^TH DAY OF MARCH, 2021

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV

¶6

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.220/2020

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SANE SAJANA REDDY

¶9

WIFE OF MAHESH KUMAR REDDY B

¶10

AGED 43 YEARS

¶11

MAHESH KUMAR REDDY B SON OF B.C. REDDEPPA REDDY

¶12

AGED 48 YEARS

¶13

BOTH RESIDING AT FLAT NO.L-102, TOWER-6, ADARSH PALM RETREAT, BELLANDUR, BENGALURU - 560 103. ... PETITIONERS

¶14

(BY SRI. R MADHUSUDHANA REDDY, ADVOCATE)

¶15

AND:

¶16

ADARSHA PALM RETREAT GULMOHAR RESIDENTS APARTMENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION AN ASSOCIATION REGISTERED UNDER KARNATAKA APARTMENT OWNERSHIP ACT, 1972 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT DEVARABISANAHALLU, BELLANDUR POST, BENGALURU - 560 103 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT RAJIV RAMAMURTHI

¶17

RAJIV RAMAMURTHI SON OF RAMAMURTHI AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS RESIDING AT FLAT NO.C-301

¶18

¶19

TOWER-1, GULMOHAR ADARSH PALM RETREAT DEVARABISANAHALLI, BELLANDUR POST, OUTER RING ROAD BENGALURU - 560 103. ... RESPONDENTS

¶20

THIS CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11(6) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 READ WITH RULE 2 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT SCHEME, 1996, PRAYING TO REFER TO ARBITRATION CENTRE, BENGALURU TO APPOINT AS THE SOLE ARBITRATOR TO ARBITRATE UPON THE DISPUTES BETWEEN THE PARTIES, AS PER CLAUSE NO.54 OF DEED OF DECLARATION, DATED 26/05/2017, ANNEXURE-B AND ETC.

¶21

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT, MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶22

ORDER

¶23

Learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo which

¶24

reads as follows:

¶25

"The petitioner in the above case prays that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the above petition with liberty to file a fresh petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 after sending a notice under Sections 11 and 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, in the interest of justice."

¶26

¶27

In light of memo filed, petition is dismissed . Liberty is reserved to file a fresh petition.

¶28

Sd/-

¶29

JUDGE

¶30

VP

Sane Sajana Reddy v. Adarsha Palm Retreat Gulmohar Residents

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sane Sajana Reddy v. Adarsha Palm Retreat Gulmohar Residents

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Imtiaz Ahmed Cricket -Academy Vs C.B.C.I. Society for Medical Education

Smt Kavitha Vs Sri H S Harsha

Smt. S. Rashmi Vs Shri. Vinay B. J.

Ms. Maramreddy Kaavya Vs M/S. Opus Developers and Builders

Royal Orchid Associated Hotels Private Limited Vs Summer Estates and Builders

Capacite Infra Projects Ltd. Vs M/S Siddha Sheka Developers LLP