Imtiaz Ahmed Cricket -Academy v. C.B.C.I. Society for Medical Education
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED…
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH, 2021
BEFORE:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV
CIVIL MISELLANEOUS PETITION NO.308 OF 2019
BETWEEN :
BANGALORE-560 005. ... PETITIONERS
[BY SRI. S.A.WAJID, ADVOCATE-ABSENT]
AND :
C.B.C.I. SOCIETY FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION, ST. JOHN’S NATIONAL ACADEMY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, SARJAPUR ROAD, BANGLAORE-560 034. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. ... RESPONDENT
[BY SRI. DESHRAJ, ADVOCATE]
THIS CIVIL MISELLANEOUS PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11(5) OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996, PRAYING TO APPOINT A SOLE ARBITRATOR PURSUANT TO THE ARBITRATION CLAUSE 23 IN THE AGREEMENT DATED 01.09.2016 PRODUCED AT
2
ANNEXURE-C AND PASS SUCH OTHER ORDER DEEMS PROPER AND FIT IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS CIVIL MISELLANEOUS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION , THIS DAY THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
No representation on behalf of the petitioners when the matter is called out. It is also noticed that there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners when the matter was called on 14.11.2019, 28.11.2019, 06.12.2019, 12.12.2019, 08.01.2021 and 19.02.2021, which clearly shows that the petitioners are not diligent in prosecuting the petition. Accordingly, petition is dismissed for nonprosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
Ksm*
Imtiaz Ahmed Cricket-Academy & Syed Imtiaz Ahmad
C.B.C.I. Society for Medical Education, St. John's National Academy of Health Sciences
S. Sunil Dutt Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court