Allowed

Bhairaveshwara Cool Point v. M/S Grant Thornton India LLP

Karnataka HC20 Dec 2021CMP/183/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Karnataka, allotting a civil miscellaneous petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, appointed Sri. Veeranna Tigadi as the sole arbitrator after a unanimous submission by both parties. The petition was allowed accordingly.

What did the court decide?

The petition was allowed by appointing Sri. Veeranna Tigadi as the sole arbitrator to settle the dispute as per the work order dated 06/02/2019.

Bhairaveshwara Cool Point Vs M/S Grant Thornton India LLP — Arbitration | Karnataka HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20^TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021

¶3

BEFORE

¶4

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT

¶5

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO.183 OF 2021

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

BHAIRAVESHWARA COOL POINT PRIVATE LIMITED CHAITRA GROUPS No.2542, 28^TH CROSS, 12^TH MAIN BANASHANKARI 2^ND STAGE BENGALURU - 560 034. REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY T.N PARAMAESH.

¶8

…PETITIONER

¶9

(BY SRI A ANIL KUMAR SHETTY, FOR SRI S SHAKER SHETTY, ADVOCATE)

¶10

AND:

¶11

M/s. GRANT THORNTON INDIA LLP., NOW 21^ST FLOOR, DLF SQUARE JACARANDA MARG DLF PHASE-II GURGAON HARYANA - 122 002 REPRESENTED BY ITS ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR MR.KARAN SOOD. …RESPONDENT

¶12

(BY SRI SANJAY H SETHIYA, ADVOCATE)

¶13

THIS CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11(6) OF THE ARBITRATION AND

¶14

¶15

CONCILIATION ACT 1996, PRAYING TO APPOINT AN ARBITRATOR AS PER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 11(6) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 AND REFER THE DISPUTE BETWEEN THE PARTIES TO THE ARBITRATOR TO SETTLE THE SAME AS PER THE WORK ORDER DATED 06/02/2019 AS PER ANNEXURE-A, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE, ACCORDING TO LAW.

¶16

THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶17

ORDER

¶18

Both the sides having argued the matter for some time, unanimously submit that Sri.Veeranna Tigadi, be appointed as and to be their sole Arbitrator.

¶19

Accordingly this petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is allowed by appointing Sri.Veeranna Tigadi and requesting him to enter into the said reference of Arbitration & to act as the Sole Arbitrator in the Arbitration and Conciliation Centre (Domestic & International), Bengaluru, as per the extant Rules.

¶20

¶21

(i) A copy of this order be sent forthwith to the Arbitration and Conciliation Centre (Domestic & International), Khanija Bhavan, Bengaluru, for proceeding further in the matter.

¶22

(ii) Registry is directed to return the original documents if any, produced by the parties after obtaining photostat copies of the same for the file.

¶23

No costs.

¶24

Sd/JUDGE

¶25

SBN

Bhairaveshwara Cool Point v. M/S Grant Thornton India LLP

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhairaveshwara Cool Point v. M/S Grant Thornton India LLP

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri. Ramachandra Nayaka Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri. Abdul Khuddus Vs Karnataka State Board of Wakfs

K B Lingaraju Vs the Deputy Registrar

Miss Anuradha Baliga Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri S P Narayanaswamy Vs the State of Karnataka

M/S Nischal Enterprises Vs the State of Karnataka