In this CCC filed under the Contempt of Courts Act, the High Court disposed of the petition. The court noted that the alleged breach had been belatedly complied with and ordered no further action.
Petition disposed of; no action initiated under the Contempt of Courts Act.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.ABHAY S. OKA, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
C.C.C NO.469 OF 2020 (CIVIL)
BETWEEN:
SOUTH CANARA DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED SADASHIVA SAHAKARA SADANA KODIALBAIL MANGALORE – 5750003 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR/CEO SRI RAVINDRA B AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
... COMPLAINANT (BY SHRI JAYKUMAR S PATIL, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SHRI MAHAMMED TAHIR A, ADVOCATE)
AND:
... ACCUSED
(SHRI B.V.KRISHNA, AGA FOR A1 AND A2 SHRI ABHINAV R, ADVOCATE FOR A3)
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 READ WITH ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA BY THE COMPLAINANT PARYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED Nos.1 TO 3 FOR NOT COMPLYING WITH THE ORDER DATED 07.02.2019 IN W.P.NO.14149/2013 PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED Nos.1 TO 3 FOR WILLFUL DISOBEDIENCE.
THIS CCC COMING ON FOR ORDERS THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, CHIEF JUSTICE MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The learned Additional Government Advocate states that an affidavit reporting compliance with the order of which breach is alleged has already been filed.
to be initiated under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Sd/-
CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/JUDGE
AHB
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to initiate contempt proceedings against accused for willful disobedience of an order when compliance has been belatedly admitted.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Abhay S. Oka
Sachin Shankar Magadum
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
