Sri Srikanti v. Sri Umashankar
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a consolidated contempt proceeding filed alleging non-compliance of an interim order from the Single Judge which was stayed by a Division Bench. The Court dropped the proceedings with liberty to revive.
What did the court decide?
Contempt proceeding is dropped with liberty to the complainant to revive the same as and when the occasion so arises.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
C.C.C. NO.181 OF 2021
IN
W.P.NO.44227 OF 2018 (S-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI SRIKANTI, S/O LATE SIDDALINGAPPA SINCE DECEASED REPRESENTED BY HIS WIFE SMT.SHASHIKALA H K AS LEGAL HEIR AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/AT:NO.166, 3RD 'B' MAIN ROAD 3RD CROSS, ADJACENT TO PIPE LINE ROAD, BIKASIPURA, BENGALURU - 560 078. ...COMPLAINANT
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether contempt proceedings should be initiated for alleged non-compliance of an order which was subsequently stayed by this Court.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sri Sri Sant, S/o Late Siddalingappa
- respondent
Umesh Shankar
- respondent
Anbu Kumar
- respondent
Krishnaji S Karichannavar
- respondent
R Nareesh
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CCC/181/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court