The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a writ petition filed seeking to call for records and quash the order of the Wakf Tribunal, solely because the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition to pursue a civil revision petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2020
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
WRIT PETITION No.62953/2011 (GM-WAKF)
BETWEEN:
... PETITIONERS
(By SRI. AHMED ALI J. RAHIMANSHAH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
2
3
| 12. | ANNAPURNA W/O NANJUNDESHWAR SAJJAN, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O NEAR CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA, OLD BUS STAND, NO. 60/90, KARNOOL, ANDHRA PRADESH. |
|---|---|
| 13. | ARUN S/O GURUNATH JIGLUR, AGE: 35 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O JIGLUR BUILDING, BANKAPUR CHOWK, P.B ROAD, HUBLI. |
| 14. | AMARNATH S/O GURUNATH JIGLUR, AGE: 33 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O JIGLUR BUILDING, BANKAPUR CHOWK, P.B ROAD, HUBLI. |
| 15. | VIDYAWATI W/O GURUNATH JIGLUR, AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O JIGLUR SERVICE STATION, OPP. ELECTRIC GRID, KARWAR ROAD, HUBLI. |
| 16. | SRIKANT S/O GURUNATH JIGLUR, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O JIGLUR SERVICE STATION, OPP. ELECTRIC GRID, KARWAR ROAD, HUBLI . |
| 17. | SHASHIKANT S/O GURUNATH JIGALUR, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O JIGLUR SERVICE STATION, OPP. ELECTRIC GRID, KARWAR ROAD, HUBLI. |
| 18. | ZAHIRABI W/O SAYYED GAFFAR BURUJWALA, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O ASAR ONI, OLD HUBLI, HUBLI . |
| 19. | ABDUL SATTAR S/O SAYYED ABDUL GAFAR BURUJWALE, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: RIKSHAW DRIVER, R/O ASAR ONI, OLD HUBLI, HUBLI . |
4
| 20. | NOOR JAHAN W/O HYDER ALI KHATIB, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O ASAR ONI, OLD HUBLI, HUBLI. |
|---|---|
| 21. | SHAKIRA BEGUM W/O HUSSAINSAN ALISAB PATEL NAVALUR, AGE: MAJOR,OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O KOPPA TANK, NEAR POST OFFICE, DHARWAD. |
| 22. | MUMTAZ BEGUM W/O ABDUL WAHAB KAZI, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O II CROSS, BEHIND KHUSRO MOSQUE, MAHANTESH NAGAR, BELGAUM. |
| 23. | JAMIL AHMED S/O SAYYED GOUSE MULLA, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: STUDENT, R/O ASAR ONI, OLD HUBLI, HUBLI. |
| 24. | SAYED ABDUL HAMID S/O ABDUL SAMAD BURUJWALE, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: RETD. GOVT. SERVANT R/O NEAR WATER TANK, NAVA AYODHA NAGAR, OLD HUBLI, HUBLI SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS, |
| 24A. | RAHAMATBI W/O SAYED ABDUL HAMID BURUJWALE, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: NEAR WATER TANK, NAVA AYODHYA NAGAR, OLD HUBLI, HUBLI. |
| 24B. | ABDUL SAMAD S/O SAYED ABDUL HAMID BURUJWALE, AGE: 57 YERAS, OCC: SERVICE IN GOVT. TREASURY OFFICE, YALLAPUR, U.K. |
| 24C. | ABDUL AZIZ S/O SAYED ABDUL HAMID BURUJWALE, AGE: 55 YERAS, OCC: SERVICE, R/O SAYED FATEHSHAN NAGAR, OPP. HINDU BURIAL GROUND AND WATER NIGAM, OLD HUBLI, HUBLI. |
5
6
7
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO, I. CALL FOR THE RECORDS OF KARNATAKA WAKF TRIBUNAL, BELGAUM DIVISION, BELGAUM PERTAINING TO CASE BEARING NO.KWT/DHD/SR-7/2004; II. QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER OF KARNATAKA WAKF TRIBUNAL, BELGAUM DIVISION, BELGAUM IN KWT/DHD/SR-7/2004 PASSED ON 21/03/2011, ANNEXURE-A.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING ‘B-GROUP’ THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the writ petition. Contents of the memo reads as under:
“In view of the recent ruling, against the orders of Wakf Tribunal, Civil Revision Petition is to be filed. Hence it is humbly prayed that the petitioners may kindly be permitted to withdraw the top noted case to file CRP, in the interest of justice and equity.”
Perused the contents of the memo.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
gab
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mehabub Khan Khanader Khan Gurani & Ors.
Karnataka State Board of Wakf & Ors.
Jyoti Mulimani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
