Shri. Ayub Ibrahim Bagawan @ Bagavan v. Smt. Surekha W/O Yeshwantappa Hulagabali
Case brief
What is this about?
ruled dismissed the appeal quashing order due ordered dismissing appeal for non-compliance with office objections
ruled dismissed the appeal quashing order due ordered dismissing appeal for non-compliance with office objections
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 04TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2020
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI
R.S.A.No.100477 OF 2017
(REDUMPTION OF MORTGAGE AND MESNE PROFITS)
BETWEEN
AGE:61 YEARS, OCC:HOUSEHOLD WORK
NOW AT R/O:SATABACHE GALLI
TQ:ATHANI, DIST:BELAGAVI-593041
(SINCE DECEASED REPRESENTED BY HER LEGAL HEIRS APPELLANT NOS. 19-A TO 19-D)
19 A) GUDUSAB AMEENSAB BAGAWAN @ BAGAVAN AGE:77 YEARS, OCC:RETIRED R/O TORAVI, DIST:VIJAYAPURA
AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD R/O:TORAVI, DIST:VIJAYAPURA
... APPELLANTS
(BY SRI.JAGADISH PATIL, ADVOCATE)
[NOTE: The L.R. of deceased original Defendant No.3 are from Defendant No.3A to 3-I. Due to over sight the lower appellant Court in its judgment has made Defendant NO.4 as Defendant NO.3-J. Therefore, the Legal Heirs of Defendant No.3 are 3-A to 3-I and 3-J has been mentioned due to oversight in 05 Judgment.]
AND
... RESPONDENTS
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, 1908, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 14.11.2016 PASSED IN R.A.NO.26/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., ATHANI, DISMISING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 22.04.2014 PASSED IN O.S.NO.172/1975 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., ATHANI, DECREEING THE SUIT FILED FOR REDEMPTION OF MORTGAGE.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
In spite of granting sufficient time to comply with the office objections, till today, learned counsel for the appellants has not complied with the same. Hence, the
appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office
objections.
Sd/JUDGE
Naa
SHRI. AYUB IBRAHIM BAGAWAN @ BAGAVAN AND OTHERS
SMT. SUREKHA W/O YESHWANTAPPA HULAGABALI AND OTHERS
ASHOK S. KINAGI
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court