This thin order dismisses a writ petition challenging an appellate tribunal decision for non-prosecution, as the petitioner failed to comply with objections and did not appear in court.
The writ petition stood dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
Dated this the 19th day of February 2020
Before
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.G. PANDIT
Writ Petition No.27876 of 2016 (CS-RES)
BETWEEN
SRI. HANUMANTHSA. T. KATARE, MAJOR CHINDI GALLI, BAMMAPUR ONI HUBLI, DHARWAD DISTRICT AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS. ...PETITIONER
(SERVICE OF COURT NOTICE ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER IS HELD SUFFICIENT; PETITIONER - ABSENT)
AND
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DATED 30.10.2015 IN APPEAL NO.721 OF 2006 VIDE ANNEXURE-F.
2
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
This writ petition was filed on 05.05.2016. Office
raised certain objections. In spite of grant of sufficient time and even after imposition of cost on two occasions,
the office objections have not been complied with.
been complied with nor the petitioner has appeared before the Court. Hence, the petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
Kms
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SRI. HANUMANTSA. T. KATARE
THE GENERAL MANAGER THE MARATA CO OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED
THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES NO.1-9
S.G. PANDIT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
