The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a writ petition filed by Ramagouda seeking honorarium under the Karnataka Village Defense Parties Act on the ground that the petitioner died during the pendency of the petition, resulting in abatement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2020
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.G. PANDIT
WRIT PETITION NO.105354/2016 (S-RES)
BETWEEN:
RAMAGOUDA S/O CHAVEGOUDA PATEL AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, OCC: EX-DALAPATHI R/O PATTANAKUDI, TALUK: CHIKODI, DISTRICT: BELAGAVI
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI. ASHOK S MENSINKAI & SRI. H.M. DHARIGOND, ADVS.)
AND
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. VEENA HEGDE, AGA FOR R1 TO R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT 1 TO 3 TO CONSIDER THE DECLARATION NOTED IN THE KARNATAKA VILLAGE DEFENSE PARTIES ACT 2004, VIDE ANNEXURE-'C' REPEALING THE KARNATAKA VILLAGE DEFENCE PARTIES ACT 1964 DATED:14.03.2004 AND TO PAY THE HONORARIUM AND THE ARREARS TO THE PETITIONER UNDER THE KARNATAKA VILLAGE DEFENSE PARTIES ACT 1964.
2
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Sri. H.M. Dharigond, learned counsel for the
petitioner submits that the petitioner died during the pendency of this writ petition. Hence, the writ petition would not survive consideration.
Submission of the learned counsel is placed on record. The writ petition is dismissed as abated.
SD/JUDGE
JTR
2 provisions across 1 enactments
RAMAGOUDA S/O CHAVEGOUDA PATEL
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
S.G. PANDIT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
