Mr. N. Venkatesh v. State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking quashing of a notification was disposed of as a withdrawal of the petition by the Chief Justice.
A writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking quashing of a notification was disposed of as a withdrawal of the petition by the Chief Justice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2020
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.ABHAY S. OKA, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY
WRIT PETITION NO.15383 OF 2019 (GM-MM-S) PIL
BETWEEN :
MR. N. VENKATESH SON OF LATE MR. N. NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 76 F1, SRI NILAYA, SWARNA KUPPAM ROBERT SONPETH KOLAR GOLD FIELDS - 563 122
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI KARAN JOSEPH, ADVOCATE)
AND :
2 . DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY NO.49, KHANIJA BHAVAN RACE COURSE ROAD BENGALURU - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR MR. N.S.PRASANNA KUMAR
RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI I. THARANATH POOJARY, AGA)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION QUASHING NOTIFICATION DATED 08.03.2019 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, CHIEF JUSTICE MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks
permission to withdraw the petition.
Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
Sd/CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/JUDGE
AHB
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mr. N. Venkatesh
State of Karnataka
Department of Mines and Geology
Abhay S. Oka
S. Vishwajith Shetty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court