Writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution were disposed of as withdrawn following a memo filed by counsel on 23.1.2020 seeking leave to withdraw.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 27th DAY OF JANUARY, 2020
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.G. PANDIT
WRIT PETITION NO.100933-937/2017(LB-RES)
BETWEEN:
(BY SRI. PATIL M H, ADVOCATE)
AND
2
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIDHAN SOUDH (M S BUILDING), BANGLORE-560001
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. VEENA HEGDE, AGA FOR R1-R3) (R4-SERVED)
THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT HE RESPONDENTS TO TAKE PROPER LEGAL ACTIOIN TO DISBURSE THE INSURANCE AMOUNT TO THE PETITIONERS AS PER ANNEXURE-W i.e. INCLUDING YATTINAHALLI VILLAGE IN HONNATTI GRAMA PANCHAYATH INSTEAD OF GUDAGURU GRAMA PANCHAYATH.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Memo dated 23.1.2020 is filed seeking leave to withdraw the writ petitions.
Memo is placed on record. Writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
JTR
SRI.CHANDRAYYA S/O CHANNABASAYYA HIREMATH
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
S.G. PANDIT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
