The Karnataka High Court disposed of the writ appeal against admission to the first appellant's dental course. Since the respondents had already granted the admission to the appellants in the writ petition, no further orders were necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 02ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2020
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V. HOSMANI
W.A.NO. 2096 OF 2015 (EDN-AD)
BETWEEN
2
| 5 . | MS.MANSI GARG, D/O RAJESH KUMAR GARG, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS. |
|---|---|
| 6 . | MS. SANDRA PURUSHOTHAMAN, D/O PURUSHATHAMAN, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS. |
| 7 . | MS. SANGEETA KARMAKAR, D/O NIRAPADA KARMAKA, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS. |
| 8 . | MS. SOJA PANICKER G., D/O GEORGE PANIKER, AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS. |
| 9 . | MR.SURAJ S., D/O SHIVAKUMAR S, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS. |
| 10 . | MS. URMILA L. D/O MR.LAKSHMINARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS. |
| 11 . | MS. VEDA VARSHA REDDY, S/O SARAVANA KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS. |
| [APPELLANTS NO.2 TO 11 ARE STUDENTS OF 1STYEAR BDS COURSE AT DR. SYAMALA REDDY, DENTAL COLLEGE & RESEARCH CENTRE, NO.111/1, SGR COLLEGE MAIN ROAD, MUNNEKOLALA, MARTHAHALLI POST, BANGALORE – 560 037] …APPELLANTS |
(BY SRI. C. R. MAHENDRA GOWDA AND SRI. VENKATESH G T, ADVOCATES ) (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE)
3
AND
(BY SRI. JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, AGA FOR R1; SRI. N.K. RAMESH, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
(THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE)
THIS APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED IN THE WRIT PETITION NO. 20416-20426/2015 DATED 10.07.2015.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, NAGARATHNA J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for second respondent- Rajiv Gandhi
University for Health Sciences submits that respondentUniversity has approved the admission of appellants No.2 to 11 by passing an order in respect of first appellant–
4
college subject to certain terms and conditions and therefore, this appeal would not survive for further consideration.
Submission of Sri. N.K.Ramesh, learned counsel for respondent No.2 is placed on record.
Hence, this writ appeal is disposed of, since appellants have been granted the relief.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
BVK CT:TAB
Dr. Syamala Reddy Dental College & Research Centre
Ms. Blaina Carol D'Souza
Mr. Falguni Roy
Ms. Kollukudur Sai Pragathi
Ms. Mansi Garg
Ms. Sandra Purushothaman
B.V. Nagarathna
Ravi V. Hosmani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
