A review petition was dismissed as infructuous because the matter had been amicably settled between the parties, rendering the petition no longer subsisting.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF MARCH 2020
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.A.PATIL
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
REVIEW PETITION NO.100001 OF 2017
BETWEEN
SRI.VINAYAK S/O PANDURANG PAI, AGE: YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O TILUVALLI, TQ: HANGAL, DIST: HAVERI.
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI AJAY U. PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND :
: 2 :
R/O: HEEREHALLI,TQ BYADAGI, DIST: HAVERI.
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI A. G. JADAV FOR R-1 ) (RESPONDENT NO.2-DECEASED)
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 114 READ WITH ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF C.P.C, PRAYING TO REVIEW AND RECALL THE ORDER DATED 09.01.2012 PASSED THIS HON'BLE COURT IN MFA NO.2379/2007, AND IN CONSEQUENCE DISMISS THE SAID APPEAL IN MFA NO.2379/2007 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 HEREIN IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, B.A.PATIL J., MADE THE FOLLOWING :
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner files a
memo stating that the petition has become infractuous as the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, it does not survive for consideration.
Said memo is placed on record.
Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
ckk
SRI.VINAYAK S/O PANDURANG PAI
M/S.UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.
SMT.KOTRAVVA S/O VEERABHADRAGOUDA PATIL
B.A.PATIL
M.I.ARUN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
