Regular first appeal filed under Section 96 CPC challenging judgment dismissing suit for declaration and injunction. Appeals due to peremptory order on compliance with objections stand dismissed without orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 2020
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.A.PATIL AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I. ARUN R.F.A.NO.100257/2017 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
... APPELLANTS
(BY SRI K.L.PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND :
: 2 :
R/O KORLAGUNDI VILLAGE, TQ. & DIST. BALLARI-583101.
... RESPONDENTS
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 23.01.2017 PASSED IN O.S.NO.112/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BALLARI, DISMISSING THE SUIT FILED FOR DECLARATION AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, B.A.PATIL, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
: 3 :
JUDGMENT
Though learned counsel for the appellants seeks time to comply the office objections, in view of the peremptory order dated 28.11.2019, appeal stands dismissed.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
EM/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an appeal filed under Section 96 CPC stands dismissed if the court records objections time to comply.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Eramma
Smt. Rathnamma
The Tahasildar
K. Shivaramappa
B.A. Patil
M.I. Arun
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
