Complaint filed under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging violation of an interim order by the principal of Sree Krishna Law College. The court found that the petitioner was ineligible due to insufficient attendance and dropped the contempt proceedings.
Contempt proceedings stands dropped as there was no violation of the court's order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
C.C.C. No.48/2020
BETWEEN:
A.KALAIARASAN S/O SRI.ARUL ARASU AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.4/171-D-1, ETTIKUTTAISTREET, JAGIR AMMAPALAYAM SALEM – 636 302 PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO.2, AXIS BANK BUILDING, NEAR APOLLO PHARMACY, G.S.PALYA ROAD, ELECTRONIC CITY, BENGALURU – 560 100.
... COMPLAINANT
(BY SRI PRASAD K.R.RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT.VIMALA AGED MAJOR, THE PRINCIPAL, SREE KRISHNA LAW COLLEGE, MAHALAKSHMI NAGAR, BATTAWADI, TUMAKURU – 572 103, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL ... ACCUSED (BY SRI V.B.SIDDARAMAIAH, ADVOCATE)
2
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, PRAYING TO HOLD THE ACCUSED GUILTY FOR COMMITTING OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1972 THEREBY VIOLATING THE ORDER DATED 27.12.2019 PASSED BY THIS COUT IN W.P.NO.51711/2019 VIDE ANNEXURE – A.
THIS CCC COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ARAVIND KUMAR J , MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
None appears for the complainant. This petition has been filed alleging that respondent has violated the order dated 27th December, 2009 passed in Writ Petition N.51711 of 2019. The order so passed reads:
“ Petitioner is permitted to appear in Third Semester Law examination, if he is otherwise eligible, subject to the rider that the results of the said examination, shall not be announced without the leave of this Court. ”
3
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
lnn
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondent violated the interim order permitting the petitioner to appear in the examination.
Whether the respondent's memo stating the petitioner lacked eligibility justified dropping the contempt proceedings.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Aravind Kumar
E.S.Indiresh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
