Smt. M Jayamma v. Rakesh Singh
Case brief
What is this about?
In contempt proceedings under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, the court found that the respondent had complied with the order dated 01.07.2019 by allotting an alternate site. The court dropped the proceedings, leaving open the complainant's substantive claim.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 02ND DAY OF MARCH, 2020
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
C.C.C. No.1481/2019 (CIVIL)
BETWEEN:
SMT. M. JAYAMMA W/O LATE M. NARASARAJU AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.27, SATYANARAYANA APARTMENT, 4TH FLOOR, 4TH MAIN ROAD, MANJUNATH LAYOUT, R.T. NAGAR BANGALORE - 560 032.
... COMPLAINANT
(BY SRI. SHALINI S, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondent willfully disobeyed the order dated 01.07.2019 requiring consideration of the complainant's representation.
Whether the allotment of an alternate site on 14.11.2019 constitutes compliance with the court's direction.
Parties & counsel
- respondent
The Commissioner Bangalore Development Authority
Coram
Aravind Kumar
Hemant Chandangoodar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- CCC/1481/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court