Smt. P. Gayathri v. Dr. N. Manjula
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt proceedings filed under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 were dismissed as withdrawn by the complainant during the hearing.
Contempt proceedings filed under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 were dismissed as withdrawn by the complainant during the hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF MARCH, 2020
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
C.C.C. No.1313/2019(CIVIL)
BETWEEN:
SMT. P. GAYATHRI W/O MADHAVA RAJU AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT NO.10, PUTTAMMA COMPOUND, K.R. LAYOUT J.P. NAGAR, 6TH PHASE BENGALURU - 560 078.
... COMPLAINANT
(BY SRI. SUNDARESHAN H.C, ADVOCATE)
AND:
DR. N. MANJULA THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA KRUPA WEST BANGALORE - 560 020.
…RESPONDENT/ACCUSED
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR DISOBEYING THE ORDER PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN W.P.NO.37405/2018 DATED;22.04.2019 AS PER THE ANNEXURE – A.
THIS CCC COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ARAVIND KUMAR J, MADE THE FOLLOWING:
2
O R D E R
Learned counsel appearing for complainant has
filed a memo seeking leave of the court to withdraw the contempt proceedings. Said memo is placed on record.
Accordingly, contempt proceedings are dismissed
as withdrawn.
SD/JUDGE
SD/-
JUDGE
RU
SMT. P. GAYATHRI W/O MADHAVA RAJU
DR. N. MANJULA THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
ARAVIND KUMAR
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court