A writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India was dismissed due to non-compliance with office objections, non-payment of court fees, and the absence of the petitioner's representative.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR
W.P.NO.39066/2017(KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
PADMANABHACHAR S/O LATE RAMAIAH @ RAMACHAR AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT CHIKKABANAVARA YESHWANTHPURA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BANGALORE – 560 090.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. A.G. PRAHALLAD., ADVOCATE)
AND:
2
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 TO 6 TO TAKE ACTION AGAINST THE R-7 AND 8 AS PER THE REPRESENTATIONS SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER ANNEXURE-E TO N.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
3
O R D E R
On account of non-compliance of office
objections, matter has been listed before the Court on 05.04.2018, 03.08.2018, 17.01.2019 and on said days further time was granted. However, office objections have not been complied with.
SD/JUDGE
RU
Padmanabhachar S/O Late Ramaiah
State of Karnataka
Deputy Commissioner Bangalore Urban District
Assistant Commissioner Bangalore North Sub Division
Tahasildhar Bangalore North Taluk
Karnataka Lokayuktha
Aravind Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
