The High Court of Karnataka, on an application seeking leave to withdraw a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR
W.P. NO.2399/2019 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
SHRI KANICK RAJ SON OF LATE ANTHONI MARISWAMY AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS R/AT KANNAMANGALA VILLAGE, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, MENTALLY DISHOARDED, REP. BY ANTHARAJ, S/O. LATE ANTHONY AGEDA BOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT KANNAMANGALA VILLAGE, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, PINCODE 560 036
... PETITIONER
(BY P.M.SIDDAMALLAPPA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
2
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.Y.D.HARSHA, AGA FOR R-1 TO R-4; SRI.B.N.PRAKASH, ADV. FOR R-5)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R-2 DTD: 29/10/2018 PASSED IN REVISION PETITION NO.235/2014-15 AS PER ANNEXURE-E AND THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R-4 IN M.R.NO.36/1998-99 AS PER ANNEXURE-C.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
3
O R D E R
Learned counsel appearing for petitioner has filed
a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. Said memo is placed on record. Accordingly, writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
SD/JUDGE
DR
Shri Kanick Raj
Government of Karnataka
Deputy Commissioner Bangalore Urban District
Asst. Commissioner Bangalore North Sub Division
Tahsildar Bangalore East Taluk
Sri. R.P. Nambiar
Aravind Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
