Disposed

Sri P. v. Rama v Sri M.U Achanna

Karnataka HC4 Sept 2019WP/25234/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Karnataka, in Writ Petition No. 25234/2015 regarding an inheritance suit, granted three weeks' time to the petitioner. The order stipulates that failure to take steps within this time will result in the automatic dismissal of the petition without further orders.

What did the court decide?

Three weeks' time was granted to take steps; automatic dismissal if steps are not taken.

Sri P. v. Rama Vs Sri M.U Achanna — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Karnataka HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 04^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2019 BEFORE

¶2

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 25234/2015 (GM-CPC)

¶4

BETWEEN

¶5

SRI P.V. RAMA, AGED ABOUT 89 YEARS, S/O LATE SHANKARA, R/AT MADE VILLAGE & POST, MADIKERI TALUK, KODAGU DISTRICT, 571211 REPRESENTED BY HIS GPA HOLDER MR. P.R. PRAKASH, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS S/O SRI. V. RAMA

¶6

...PETITIONER/S

¶7

BY SRI. M. VINOD KUMAR, ADV. VCO DTD 3/10/16, SACHIN.B.S. ADV. FOR PETR (VK FILED) NOC OBTAINED

¶8

AND:

¶9

SRI. M.U. ACHANNA MAJOR IN AGE, MADE VILLAGE & POST, MADIKERI TALUK, KODAGU DISTRICT,571211

…2

W.P.No.25234/2015

SRI. M.A. ANNI @ PRAKASH, MAJOR IN AGE, S/O M.U. ACHANNA, MADE VILLAGE & POST, MADIKERI TALUK, KODAGU DISTRICT, 571211

¶14

BOTH ARE PRESENTLY RESIDING AT C/O CHANDRALEKHA DEVADIGA, KOTTARA CROSS, BUSHRA COMPOUND, URVA STORES, MANGALORE. 574201

¶15

UMMER, MULAIAR IN MADE MASJID, MAJOR IN AGE, MADE VILLAGE & POST, MADIKERI TALUK, KODAGU DISTRICT, 571211

¶16

ABOOBACKER, MAJOR IN AGE, S/O UMMER, TAILOR,

¶17

HAMID, MAJOR IN AGE, S/O MAMAN,

¶18

BILLAVARA SANKAPPA, MAJOR IN AGE,

¶19

SRI. M.A. SHESHAPPA, MAJOR IN AGE, S/O LATE M.P.APPACHA, RESIDENT OF MADENADU, MADE VILLAGE & POST, 571211 MADIKERI TALUK, KODAGU DISTRICT,

¶20

SRI. P.L. DASAPPA MAJOR IN AGE, S/O LATE LINGAPPA, RESIDENT OF MADENADU,

…3

W.P.No.25234/2015

MADE VILLAGE & POST, MADIKERI TALUK, KODAGU DISTRICT. 571211

¶25

…RESPONDENT/S

¶26

BY SRI. S.G. LOKESH ADV FOR R-7 (VK FILED) VCO DTD 3/10/16 NOTICE TO R1 & R3 TO R6 HELD SUFFICIENT, R-8 SERVED

¶27

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE HON’BLE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE [JR.DN.] AND JMFC KODAGU, MADIKERI DATED: 16.12.2014 ON I.A. NO. 24 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 [I.E. JDR NO.2} VIDE ANNEXURE-E, TO RECALL THE DELIVERY WARRANT, IN EX. NO, TO 28/2007 IN O.S. NO. 69/1996 VIDE ANNEXURE-E AND ALLOW I.A. NO. 24 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BY CALLING FOR THE RECORDS AND ALLOW THE ABOVE WRIT PETITION.

¶28

THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS ON THIS DAY THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER.

…4

W.P.No.25234/2015

ORDER

Three weeks’ time is granted to take steps, failing which, the petition stands dismissed automatically.

¶34

SD/JUDGE

¶35

TYPED BY : JAY CASE WORKER: HPR COMPARED BY: HPR

¶36

COPY Sd/-

¶37

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Sri P. v. Rama v Sri M.U Achanna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri P. v. Rama v Sri M.U Achanna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Fameeda Faraz Vs Anil Acharya

Anil Kumar Vs Hanumantharaju P

Vijaya Shankar Vs Mr Ganesh

C. Damodaran Vs D. Karthikeyan

Ameer Ali Vs Anil Acharya

Sri. L. Vijaya Kumar Vs Sri C Y Mallappa