The High Court granted three weeks to comply with office objections. Failure to comply resulted in the dismissal of the Miscellaneous First Appeal filed under Section 173(1) of the MV Act seeking compensation enhancement.
Dismissal of the Miscellaneous First Appeal for non-compliance with office objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2019
BEFORE
THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S. DIXIT
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 4457 OF 2018
BETWEEN
1 . FAMEEDA FARAZ W/O U.J.MOHAMMED, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT DARUL SALAM, NEAR BADRIYA JUMMA MASZID, SANTHOSHNAGARA, KARAMBALLI, AMBAGILU, SHIVALLI VILLAGE, UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT
AGE ABOUT 55 YEARS, S/O LATE IBRAHIM, R/AT DARUL SALAM, NEAR BADRIYA JUMMA MASZID, SANTHOSHNAGARA, KARAMBALLI, AMBAGILU, SHIVALLI VILLAGE, UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT
...Appellants
(By Sri. RAJENDRA V G., ADVOCATE)
AND
MFA.No.4457/2018 2
------------------------R/AT MELMANE, SANTOORU, KANJARAKATTE, UDUPI TALUK
2 . THE CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD., CHENNAI, REP BY DIVISIONAL MANAGER, DIVISIONAL OFFICE, BENDOOR WELL ROAD, 1ST FLOOR, 16-1-44 S.R.COMPLEX, MANGALURU …Respondents
This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed U/s 173(1) of MV Act, against the Judgment and Award dated: 27.09.2017 passed in M.V.C. No. 632/2013 on the file of the ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDITIONAL MACT, UDUPI, Partly allowing the claim petition for compensation and seeking enhancement of compensation.
This Miscellaneous First Appeal is coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following:
3
MFA.No.4457/2018 -------------------------
ORDER
Three weeks time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the appeal stands dismissed on its own.
Sd/JUDGE
NOTE: Vide Court Order dt. 03.09.2019, Office objections are not complied with. Hence Appeal stands dismissed.
T By: MP COPY R By: AV C By: TS Sd/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Fameeda Faraz W/o U.J.Mohammed
U.J.Mohammed
Anil Acharya S/o Raghavendra Acharya
The Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Co Ltd
Krishna S. Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
