M.M.Nadaf v. the Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Karnataka disposed of a writ petition where the petitioner, a petrol dealer, sought directions to alter a highway design proposal.
What did the court decide?
Directed the respondent authorities to dispose of the petitioner's representation within 30 days and communicate the findings.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2019
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV
WRIT PETITION NO.109519 OF 2019 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN
M.M.NADAF AGE: 52 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, PROPRIETOR, AZAD OIL DISTRIBUTORS, HPCL DEALER, N.H.48, BIRDUR CROSS, TAVARAMELLALLI, TQ: SAVANUR, DIST: HAVERI.
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI.SURESH P HUDEDAGADDI, ADV.)
AND
- THE UNION OF INDIA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, TO NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY, NEW DELHI.
- THE GENERAL MANAGER (TECH) AND PROJECT DIRECTOR, NATINOAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA, II CROSS, SATTUR COLONY, VIDYAGIRI, DHARWAD.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ court should issue directions regarding the design alteration of a highway project or direct the authorities to consider the representation.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.M.Nadaf
- respondent
The Union of India Rep. By Its Secretary, To National Highway Authority, New Delhi
- respondent
The General Manager (Tech) and Project Director, NATINOAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA, II Cross, Sattur Colony, Vidyagiri, Dharwad
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/109519/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court