Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 Of The Constitution filed to quash an impugned order. Petitioner's counsel submitted an appeal remedy existed and intended to withdraw. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 06TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2019
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV
WRIT PETITION No.109581/2016 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
V. NAGAPPA S/O V. MAREPPA SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS
2
NO.1828/32, TIRUMALANATHA BUILDING NUTAN COLLEGE MAIN ROAD, OPP. KRISHI VIGYAN KENDRA, ANJANEYA BADAVANE, DAVANAGERE-577 006.
... PETITIONERS
(BY SRI.P.N. HATTI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
VADDE LAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE VADDE MAREPPA SINCE DECEASED
3
4
HOTEL KUBERA, STATION ROAD BALLARI.
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PRAKASH BADIGER, ADVOCATE)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING THIS COURT TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 25.04.2015 PASSED BY THE I ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT BALLARI IN FDP NO.51/2004.
5
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo and states that as against the impugned order, there is a remedy by way of an appeal, hence, he intends to withdraw the present writ petition.
In the light of the memo filed and submission made, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, in the event of initiation of the proceedings to challenge the validity of the impugned order, time spent before this Court would be taken note of while considering the application for condonation of delay.
SD/JUDGE
JTRP
V. Nagappa s/o V. Mareppa since deceased by his LRS
Vadde Lakshmamma w/o Late Vadde Mareppa since deceased
S. Sunil Dutt Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
